
Starting Your Sustainable Seafood Journey
Welcome, industry partners!
The Conservation Alliance for Seafood Solutions (CASS) created this guide to orient the seafood industry to available resources across a range of environmental and social topics.
The guide is designed for those new to seafood sustainability or who need a quick refresher. Inside, you’ll find fundamental concepts like key definitions, the importance of time-bound goals, and how certifications and ratings fit into the broader sustainability picture. It also includes an overview of the data collection process and tips for making responsible sourcing decisions.
While numerous helpful tools exist (many of which were developed by Alliance members), we’ve intentionally created this guide to be a primer on the topic. We’ve included both existing tools and those in development to:
- Build foundational knowledge – Provide newcomers with clear, accessible definitions and core concepts in seafood sustainability
- Support informed decision-making – Offer practical guidance on setting goals, understanding certifications/ratings, and making responsible sourcing choices
- Connect to broader resources – Serve as an entry point that orients readers to existing tools and initiatives developed by Alliance members
If you are a company, use this resource to:
- Onboard new sustainability staff coming from other sectors
- Give a refresher to existing staff on the sustainability landscape
- Take the next step to deepen your sustainability commitments
If you are an NGO, use this resource to:
- Share with your industry partners!
- Find a common language you can use in developing partnerships with companies
- Onboard new staff to your oceans and seafood programs
When you’re ready to dig deeper, we invite you to join the Alliance! Click here to start your application for free membership in our active community of experts.
If you’d like an introduction to any of the partners mentioned, further information on the linked resources, or have any other questions, please reach out to Laura Miller, Director of Community Engagement, at laura@solutionsforseafood.org at any time.
Thank you for your commitment to building a more responsible seafood supply chain. We’re here to support your sustainability journey and look forward to collaborating with you!
Please note: Inclusion in this guide does not mean endorsement by the Alliance or a recommendation of one program over another.
Ringkasan
Seafood sustainability can feel overwhelming.
CASS provides tools for businesses to understand the basics and take action. Begin by understanding why sustainability matters, exploring available resources, and evaluating your current position. Then, look for ways to improve—whether by sourcing more responsibly or finding new suppliers.
Sustainable seafood is caught or farmed in ways that protect ocean ecosystems, ensure long-term supply, and respect the rights of workers and communities. It’s about more than avoiding overfishing—it also means minimizing habitat damage, reducing pollution, and promoting fair and safe working conditions throughout the supply chain.
Seafood plays a vital role in global food security, but with wild fish harvests mostly unchanged since the 1980s and demand continuing to rise, how we produce and source seafood matters more than ever. Aquaculture, or the farming of fish, now accounts for about half of the world’s supply, presenting unique challenges and opportunities.
Because every species and production method is different, sustainability isn’t one-size-fits-all. A responsible approach considers both environmental impact and social responsibility to ensure that seafood remains viable for future generations.
You need to define it!
Develop a definition of sustainable seafood that aligns with your company’s values, priorities, and operational practices. Your definition can include the certifications you recognize, key environmental criteria, and your commitments to fair labor and social responsibility.


- Farming Method, including:
- On/Off Bottom Cultures
- Ponds and Tanks
- Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS)
- Net Pens
- Environmental Impact of Farming Methods
- Whether or not the species is native to the environment (especially important where there is a possibility of escape)
- Potential Chemical Use
- Feed type
- Stock Levels
- Catch Volume
- Species Conservation Status (I.e., Is it an endangered or threatened species?)
- Environmental Impact of Fishing Gear
- Bycatch, or incidental catch, of non-targeted species
- Endangered species
- Overfished species
- Non-marine animals
- Effectiveness of Fisheries Management
While sustainability standards may vary by organization, region, or goal, most definitions consider a core set of factors—like stock health, environmental impact, management practices, and working conditions—to determine if a species is produced responsibly.
First, we need to understand the types of entities that evaluate the sustainability of seafood. These entities fit into the three groups below:



Governments are tasked with managing the resources and determining laws that help maintain the balance between the seafood industry and the resource. The impact of governmental policies and fisheries management can vary significantly worldwide.
The seafood industry organizes several trade associations to help manage the resources necessary to sustain its businesses.
Conservation organizations strive to ensure that governments and the industry are being conservative enough in their efforts to preserve the environment and the long-term supply of wild and farmed seafood.
Conservation organizations play several key roles that are worth highlighting. These include:
- Policy Advocacy
- Industry Partnerships
- Research
- Certifications
- Ratings
- Watchdogs
These elements are all necessary to drive the seafood sector toward a more sustainable future.
Reviewing and implementing catch levels is essential for ensuring the health and longevity of a particular species, and it allows for an analysis of a fishery’s overall management. For example, in the United States, NOAA Fisheries (also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service) conducts annual surveys using a multi-step process to inform these catch limit decisions. These steps include:
- Step 1: Calculating the Overfishing Limit – The regional fishery management council calculates the catch level corresponding to the stock’s maximum sustainable yield. Overfishing is of particular concern as it diminishes the long-term health of the overall population.
- Step 2: Recommending the Acceptable Biological Catch – The Scientific and Statistical Committees make recommendations by adjusting the catch limit downward from the overfishing limit to account for scientific uncertainty.
- Step 3: Specifying the Annual Catch Limit – Catch limits are typically set to equal the recommended acceptable biological catch and cannot exceed it.
- Step 4: Setting Annual Catch Targets – Once catch limits or targets (targets are set below the annual catch limit) are determined, this information is used to develop fishing regulations (e.g., gear restrictions, minimum fish length, etc.). Please find more information on how NOAA sets its annual catch limit di sini.
While there is no national oversight agency for aquaculture in the US, management of US-based farms is considered strong, and extensive regulations are in place regarding predator control, therapeutic uses, and disease management. Permitting varies by state, with numerous federal agencies providing some degree of oversight.
These include:
- The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) coordinates national aquaculture policy and provides industry with research, information, and extension services.
- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the discharge of waste from aquaculture facilities. The EPA authorizes state governments to regulate aquaculture discharges per National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. These permits help control and monitor the discharge levels of solids and other pollutants. Discharge from aquaculture facilities is also subject to additional regulations under individual state laws and the relevant state agencies.
- The Fisheries and Wildlife Service (FWS) regulates the introduction and transport of fish; and,
- The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Veterinary Medicine is responsible for approving and monitoring the use of drugs and medicated feeds in the aquaculture industry.
Certifications and ratings complement each other to drive improvement and meet the broad market needs of stakeholders, including producers, businesses, governments, and NGOs.
- Ratings focus on assessing as many seafood sources as possible in key markets to provide information on the full spectrum of performance, ranging from low to high, for fisheries and aquaculture. This information serves as a tool to identify opportunities for producers to pursue improvement projects and certifications, as well as to help businesses evaluate their sourcing options.
- Certifications directly engage with fisheries or farms, requiring them to address social and environmental challenges to improve and meet the certification standards. Certifications also engage with the supply chain to verify the sustainability, responsibility, and origin of certified products.
Want to dive deeper?
Head to the Kolaborasi Sertifikasi dan Rating Website and refer to the Certification & Ratings Collaboration’s Sustainable Seafood Data Tool, which compiles information from multiple sources about environmental performance and human rights abuses and risks in global seafood production.
Some Key Certification Schemes To Know
Depending on their commitments, buyers may align with specific environmental certification requirements, accept certifications benchmarked and recognized by the Global Sustainable Seafood Initiative (GSSI), or look for schemes that are ISEAL (International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling) Code Compliant to ensure credibility. These certifications help verify that seafood is sourced responsibly, taking into account both environmental and social sustainability standards.
Examples of certification schemes:
Several key organizations advise buyers on their commitments. These groups collaborate with buyers to advance sustainability in their seafood sourcing. They help set commitments, establish sourcing goals, and evaluate seafood products against sustainability criteria to measure and track progress.
Join the Pusat Global Daring to connect with key organizations driving impactful change in this space.
There are six actionable components to build your understanding of your supply chain:
- 1. Compile a map of your supply chain.
- Identify suppliers at all levels, from direct partners to raw material sources.
- 2. Get to know your stakeholders.
- Understand who is involved, including suppliers, labor brokers, and industry groups.
- 3. Identify present and future risks.
- Assess potential risks like forced labor, illegal fishing, and environmental harm.
- 4. Use available tools
- Leverage industry resources, certifications, and risk assessment tools.
- 5. Engage your suppliers.
- Build relationships, discuss ethical sourcing, and encourage transparency.
- 6. Set a strong foundation from the start.
- Apply this knowledge to define goals, refine practices, and track progress.
Finally, if you seek a north star for your company to get started, look to Visi untuk Makanan Laut dan Panduan bagi Perusahaan.
AT A GLANCE / KEY REMINDERS
🐟 IT’S A JOURNEY: The journey to responsible seafood is ongoing and requires continuous improvement and adaptation.
🐟 SET YOUR VISION, THEN ACT: Establish a clear vision, goals, and targets with measurable, time-bound commitments.
🐟 EMBED THROUGHOUT THE ORGANIZATION: Integrate environmental and social responsibility commitments into all aspects of the business.
🐟 DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE: Conduct ongoing due diligence to identify and address actual and potential impacts in the supply chain.
🐟 ITERATION IS NECESSARY: Regularly assess and adjust your approach as circumstances change and progress is made.
🐟 COMMUNICATE AND COLLABORATE: Maintain open communication with stakeholders and collaborate to achieve goals.
🐟 BE ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT: Be transparent about progress, even if goals are not met, to establish trust and accountability.
🐟 ACT ACROSS YOUR SPHERES OF INFLUENCE: Work towards improvements in direct and indirect spheres of influence, including advocacy and collaboration.
🐟 COLLECT DATA: Implement a robust data collection process to understand the environmental and social impacts of the seafood being sourced.
🐟 PRIORITIZE: Prioritize actions based on risk, impact, and business priorities.
🐟 CREATE AN ACTION PLAN: Develop specific action plans with clear activities, timelines, and metrics to achieve goals.
🐟 MONITOR AND REPORT: Establish a system for monitoring progress and reporting outcomes transparently.
Take Action
To assess the sustainability of seafood products—whether they’re certified, rated, or part of an improvement project—companies need reliable data. Collecting Key Data Elements (KDEs) through a traceability system aligned with the Dialog Global tentang Ketertelusuran Makanan Laut (GDST) helps businesses create a baseline, identify gaps, and track progress over time.
This is no longer just about ethical sourcing—it is increasingly a legal requirement due to regulations such as:
- U.S. Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) – Requires traceability documentation for particular imported seafood species to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing and seafood fraud. KDEs such as species name, harvest method, and fishing location must be accurately documented. In the United States, NOAA Fisheries bekerja untuk memastikan bahwa permintaan yang tinggi untuk makanan laut impor tidak menciptakan insentif untuk kegiatan penangkapan ikan ilegal.
- FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Section 204 – Mandates traceability of high-risk foods, including seafood, to ensure food safety and rapid response to contamination risks. KDEs must be collected and maintained throughout the supply chain.
- EU IUU Regulation & EU Digital Product Passport (Upcoming) – The EU requires detailed catch documentation to prevent IUU seafood from entering the market, and future digital traceability rules will likely require comprehensive KDE tracking. The Jam Tangan IUU UE offers a broad spectrum of views on the issue of illegal fishing, how to stop it, and how to secure the effective implementation of EU regulations to end IUU.
To learn more about IUU Fishing, check out:
- NS FAO menyelenggarakan informasi umum, alat, berita, dan sumber daya untuk organisasi yang tertarik mempelajari lebih lanjut tentang penangkapan ikan IUU.
- NS Aliansi Makanan Laut untuk Legalitas dan Ketertelusuran (SALT) is implemented by FishWise and provides an online hub and stage for sharing seafood traceability and IUU fishing knowledge from around the world. Through collaboration, the SALT community helps spark creative solutions for legal and sustainable seafood.
- Perwalian Amal Pew memiliki serangkaian ringkasan masalah dan visualisasi data yang informatif tentang Port State Measures Agreement.
- NS NRDC memiliki lembar fakta tentang makanan laut yang tidak etis dan bagaimana kepemimpinan AS dapat mengekang penangkapan ikan ilegal.
- NS Panduan Pelaksanaan PAS 1550 bertujuan untuk mendukung pembeli dan rantai pasokan melakukan uji tuntas untuk menghindari makanan laut yang ditangkap secara ilegal.
- IUU Risk Assessment: The Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions, Friends of Ocean Action, FishWise, and Global Fishing Watch are collaborating to develop an IUU Supply Chain Risk Tool, aiming to enable seafood companies and retailers to identify risks in their operations with a single, comprehensive tool.
An essential step in this process is identifying gaps in your traceability, supply chain, and social and labor practices. As you assess your current system, what major weaknesses or risks stand out? Recognizing these areas will help you focus on meaningful improvements.
To learn more about assessing and comparing the performance of companies’ commitments and progress, check out:
- Kemajuan Makanan Laut – Tracks Canadian seafood businesses’ performance against their sustainable seafood commitments.
- Indeks Pengelolaan Makanan Laut – Measures how the world’s 30 leading seafood companies contribute to the sustainable management of oceans and coastal ecosystems and work to ensure responsible social practices are implemented.
- Kartu Skor Pengecer Tuna Greenpeace – Assesses how companies address human rights and environmental issues in their sourcing policies for tuna, both canned and fresh/frozen, in a report.
Whenever possible, prioritize sourcing from responsible and verifiable sources, such as certified fisheries, Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs), and Aquaculture Improvement Projects (AIPs). These sources align with sustainability and ethical labor standards while reducing supply chain vulnerabilities.
However, when sourcing from certified or actively improving sources is not an option, it’s essential to consider how to engage with high-risk or “red-listed” fisheries, farms, or suppliers that are integral to your business. Rather than immediately walking away, collaborate with suppliers, NGOs, and other stakeholders to support their progress toward more responsible practices. By encouraging participation in FIPs, AIPs, or working toward certification, businesses can help drive positive change in the industry while maintaining key supply relationships.
Building strong partnerships with suppliers is essential for driving improvements in sustainability, traceability, and social responsibility. Rather than treating suppliers as merely transactional partners, businesses should actively engage with them to encourage and support positive change.
These are some common steps you can take to begin:
- Help suppliers transition to recognized certifications (e.g., MSC, ASC, Fair Trade) or encourage participation in Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) and Aquaculture Improvement Projects (AIPs).
- Consider rewarding suppliers who demonstrate progress with incentives such as long-term contracts or preferred supplier status.
- Collaborate with suppliers to establish fair wages, ensure safe working conditions, and implement responsible recruitment practices that prevent forced labor and human rights violations.
- Encourage participation in independent third-party audits (e.g., SA8000, SEDEX) and establish mechanisms to ensure worker engagement, thereby ensuring that labor rights are respected.
- Make data sharing and compliance from suppliers required by collaborating to collect key data elements (KDEs) related to species, fishing or farming location, method, and certification status.
- Encourage suppliers to use digital traceability solutions to ensure compliance with SIMP, FSMA 204, and EU regulations.
- Share best practices, training, and tools to help suppliers adopt more sustainable and ethical practices.
- Maintain open communication with suppliers to monitor progress and address challenges proactively.
Publicly sharing information about your seafood sourcing practices demonstrates accountability, builds consumer and stakeholder trust, and aligns with growing regulatory and market expectations for supply chain transparency. Companies should proactively disclose their progress in sustainability, ethical labor practices, and traceability to show a commitment to responsible seafood sourcing.
For Environmental & Social Performance Data:
- Provide clear and verifiable information on where seafood is sourced, including data on:
- Species & origin (e.g., wild-caught or farmed, fishery location).
- Certifications & improvement projects (e.g., MSC, ASC, Fair Trade, FIPs, AIPs).
- Fishing & aquaculture methods (e.g., gear types, farming practices).
- Disclose actions taken to address social responsibility concerns, such as worker protections, fair wages, and human rights safeguards.
- Use Key Data Elements (KDEs) and GDST-aligned traceability to support data accuracy.
To Publish Regular Progress Updates:
- Report annually on commitments, goals, and measurable improvements, including:
- Percentage of certified or improving seafood in the supply chain
- Engagement with FIPs/AIPs and high-risk fisheries transitioning to better practices
- Steps taken to enhance traceability and labor protections
- Share successes and challenges to demonstrate continuous progress, rather than just highlighting achievements.
To Utilize Multiple Reporting Channels:
- Publish sustainability reports or dedicated seafood sourcing updates on your website.
- Participate in third-party reporting initiatives, such as:
- Seafood Watch Business Partner Program
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
- UN Global Compact Communication on Progress
- NS Proyek Pengungkapan Laut enables seafood businesses to demonstrate their commitment to transparency and responsible seafood sourcing by disclosing annual sourcing details of their seafood production for a yearly fee.
- NS Platform Transparansi Sumber (STP) (an initiative of the Yayasan Tiang dan Garis Internasional (IPNLF)) allows companies to upload sourcing information directly onto the STP, publicly disclosing important information regarding their fish sourcing activities, social responsibility policies, and due diligence actions.
- Advocate for government action on fisheries transparency.
- Mendorong pemerintah untuk berpartisipasi dalam Inisiatif Transparansi Perikanan, which supports coastal countries in enhancing the credibility and quality of national fisheries information.
- Utilize packaging, product labels, and digital traceability platforms (e.g., QR codes, blockchain) to provide consumers with direct access to sourcing details.
Consider Why Public Transparency Matters:
- Builds consumer and partner trust.
- Encourages responsible sourcing and ethical labor practices.
- Aligns with global regulations requiring greater traceability (e.g., SIMP, FSMA 204, EU regulations).
- Creates brand differentiation by showing leadership in sustainability, appealing to ethical consumers and investors.
Education is a powerful tool in driving sustainable and responsible seafood sourcing. By raising awareness and providing training, businesses can empower employees, suppliers, and customers to make informed decisions and actively contribute to sustainability goals.
Train Employees & Internal Teams:
- Develop training programs to educate procurement, sourcing, and sales teams on:
- Environmental & social issues in seafood (e.g., overfishing, IUU fishing, forced labor risks).
- The importance of certifications & improvement projects (e.g., MSC, ASC, Fair Trade, FIPs, AIPs).
- Traceability & compliance requirements (e.g., SIMP, FSMA 204, EU regulations).
- Ensure employees understand how sourcing decisions impact sustainability goals and are equipped to communicate these efforts to stakeholders and customers.
Engage & Support Suppliers:
- Host supplier workshops, training sessions, and one-on-one engagement meetings to:
- Explain traceability expectations (KDEs, GDST compliance, etc).
- Share best practices for improving labor rights, ethical sourcing, and environmental responsibility.
- Guide suppliers on how to transition to certified or improve fisheries and farms.
- Offer resources, toolkits, and mentorship opportunities to help suppliers align with sustainability commitments.
Educate Customers & Consumers:
- Use labels, QR codes, and digital platforms to provide consumers with information about the origin, sustainability, and ethical impact of their seafood purchases.
- Conduct consumer education campaigns through social media, websites, and in-store materials on:
- The value of sustainable certifications and responsible sourcing.
- The importance of supporting traceable and ethically sourced seafood.
- How consumer choices drive industry-wide improvements in sustainability.
- Collaborate with third-party organizations, sustainability groups, and regulatory bodies to strengthen industry-wide learning and engagement.
Advocacy plays a crucial role in advancing sustainability, improving labor conditions, and strengthening traceability across global seafood supply chains. Businesses should actively support policies, initiatives, and industry collaborations that drive meaningful improvements in fisheries, aquaculture, and labor practices.
Some launching points to begin advocating for change are below:
Mendukung Improvements in Fisheries and Aquaculture
- Advocate for science-based fisheries management policies to ensure sustainable harvesting practices.
- Support the expansion of Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) and Aquaculture Improvement Projects (AIPs) in high-risk areas.
- Encourage responsible aquaculture practices that minimize environmental impacts, such as better feed sourcing, waste management, and disease control.
Promote Fair Working Conditions and Social Responsibility
- Endorse policies and industry initiatives that combat forced labor, human trafficking, and unfair wages in seafood supply chains.
- Advocate for safe and ethical recruitment practices to prevent debt bondage and exploitative labor conditions.
- Support gender equity initiatives in fisheries and aquaculture, ensuring equal opportunities and protections for women and marginalized groups.
Engage in Industry and Government-Led Initiatives
Companies can strengthen their advocacy efforts by actively participating in leading industry coalitions, policy forums, and regulatory discussions. For example, exploring opportunities to participate in Supply Chain Roundtables relevant to your products may be:
- Asian Farmed Shrimp
- Global Mahi
- Global Marine Ingredients (coordinated by IFFO)
- Global Octopus
- Global Squid
- Indonesian Snapper and Grouper
- Mexican Shrimp
- Mexican Snapper and Grouper
- US Gulf of Mexico Shrimp
Engage with Policymakers and Regulators
- Advocate for stronger enforcement of import regulations like SIMP (U.S.), FSMA 204, and EU IUU regulations to eliminate illegal seafood from supply chains.
- Work with government agencies (e.g., NOAA, FDA, European Commission, ASEAN fisheries bodies) to align on best practices and industry standards.
- Participate in public consultations, industry forums, and trade policy discussions to shape seafood governance.
- Jelajahi Indeks Penangkapan Ikan Global, a study of fish stock health and fisheries governance and management in 142 maritime countries worldwide, identifying key national-level areas for improvement.
- Explore the proposed Kartu Skor Tata Kelola Laut, which seeks to create indicators of good fishery management and good labor practices to drive improvement.
Learn about Pre-competitive Platforms, Ratings Coalitions, and Benchmarks
- laporan CEA “The Landscape Review of Sustainable Seafood Precompetitive Collaborations“ memberikan informasi dasar dan mengilustrasikan luasnya berbagai platform pra-persaingan dan industri yang berfokus pada keberlanjutan makanan laut.
- NS Aliansi Peringkat Makanan Laut Global is a network of seafood rating organizations that supports the sustainable production of seafood through environmental performance evaluations, issue salience, and product promotion.
- Inisiatif Makanan Laut Berkelanjutan Global tolok ukur sertifikasi makanan laut lingkungan dan menyelaraskan upaya dan sumber daya global untuk mengatasi tantangan keberlanjutan makanan laut.
- Inisiatif Rantai Pasokan Berkelanjutan baru saja membuat tolok ukur sosial untuk sertifikasi makanan laut dengan lingkup operasi di laut.
- Connect through the CASS Pusat Global to network with different organizations, learn about sustainability initiatives, and stay informed on industry-wide improvements.
Here are some additional key organizations and initiatives to explore:
| Organisasi | Focus Area |
|---|---|
| National Fisheries Institute (NFI) & Councils (e.g., Crab Council) | Industry-led sustainability and responsible sourcing in U.S. seafood markets. |
| Aliansi Tuna Global (GTA) | Market-driven sustainability improvements in tuna fisheries, including FAD management and IUU fishing prevention. |
| Satgas Seafood | Multi-stakeholder initiative addressing illegal labor practices and sustainability in Southeast Asian seafood supply chains. |
| Dialog Global tentang Ketertelusuran Makanan Laut (GDST) | Sets global standards for seafood traceability to combat IUU fishing and improve transparency. |
| GLOBALG.AP | Producer of farm assurance solutions and standards supporting safe and responsible agriculture, aquaculture, and floriculture. |
| Aliansi Makanan Laut Global (GSA) | International, nonprofit trade association and holder of Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) certification. |
| Global Seafood Sustainability Initiative (GSSI) | Benchmarking and aligning seafood certification programs to strengthen supply chain credibility. |
| Yayasan Keberlanjutan Makanan Laut Internasional (ISSF) | Science-driven approaches to improving global tuna fisheries. |
| Fair Trade USA – Seafood Program | Promotes fair wages, ethical labor practices, and environmental sustainability in fisheries and aquaculture. |
| Seafood Watch Business Partner Program (Monterey Bay Aquarium) | Provides businesses with guidance on responsible seafood sourcing and consumer education. |
| International Labour Organization – Fisheries & Aquaculture Sector (ILO) | Promotes fair wages, ethical labor practices, and environmental sustainability in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors. |
| Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) | Investigates human rights abuses and environmental crimes in the seafood industry. |
| Kemitraan Perikanan Berkelanjutan (SFP) | Works with companies to assess fisheries and develop supply chain improvement strategies. |
| Dewan Penatalayanan Kelautan (MSC) & Dewan Penatalayanan Akuakultur (ASC) | Certification bodies promoting sustainable fishing and responsible aquaculture practices. |
Engage effectively in policy and advocacy efforts to promote responsible seafood production. This Alliance-developed guide emphasizes the importance of clear and well-structured policy and advocacy requests within the seafood community. It offers guidance for both requesters and requestees to ensure effective collaboration.
- For requesters: This involves providing key messages, clear asks with timelines, identifying recipients and desired supporters, and outlining the anticipated impact and relation to the requestees’ priorities.
- For requestees: It encourages transparency, public support, continued dialogue, and consideration of how reforms contribute to their bottom line.
- For the Alliance: It clarifies the scope of advocacy efforts and encourages the sharing of policy reforms related to responsible seafood production.
Unduh Pedoman Kebijakan & Advokasi di sini.
Note: This guide serves as general guidance and is not an exhaustive list of all available resources. Companies should explore additional tools and expertise relevant to their specific needs and supply chains.
Set Goals & Commitments
To drive meaningful progress, companies must set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that guide decision-making and demonstrate accountability. Once you have assessed your products and understand your baseline, you will be able to:
These goals state how you would like your baseline assessment numbers to improve. This should be a goal that names a specific type of product and your sustainability goals, building upon what you learned in your Assessment.
Set short-term (1-3 years) and long-term (5-10 years) targets for continuous improvement.
Examples of time-bound sustainability goals:
- Achieve 100% certified sustainable seafood sourcing (MSC, ASC, Fair Trade) by [specific year].
- Ensure 100% of suppliers participate in Fishery or Aquaculture Improvement Projects (FIPs/AIPs) by [specific year].
- Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the supply chain by X% by [specific year].
- Eliminate IUU-sourced seafood by strengthening traceability and supplier audits by [specific year].
- Implement full traceability using a GDST-aligned system across all seafood products by [specific year].
- Improve worker protections by requiring all suppliers to follow fair labor standards (e.g., SEDEX, SA8000) by [specific year].
Once you’ve established a baseline and set time-bound goals, you can formalize your efforts with a public commitment. A well-defined commitment helps guide internal efforts, aligns teams, and builds trust with partners and consumers.
These commitments typically outline:
- Species or Products: Specify which products the commitment covers. It could apply to all your seafood, just wild or farmed products, a specific percentage, or particular key species.
- Definition of Sustainability: Clearly define what sustainability means for your business. This might include recognized certifications (like MSC or ASC), ratings (such as Seafood Watch), and participation in improvement projects (FIPs or AIPs).
- Timeline: Set a target date for achieving your goals. For example: “By 2030, 100% of our tuna will be MSC-certified or sourced from a credible FIP.”
- Establish a baseline measurement to assess the current state of sustainability within your supply chain.
- Conduct annual progress reviews to evaluate goal achievement and identify areas for improvement.
- Adjust targets as necessary to adapt to new regulations, market trends, and scientific advancements.
- Communicate Progress Transparently
- Publicly report progress annually via a sustainability report, company website, or third-party platform (e.g., Seafood Watch, Global Reporting Initiative).
- Share both successes and challenges, reinforcing accountability and continuous improvement.
- Engage stakeholders—including suppliers, customers, and NGOs—to collaborate on solutions and drive industry-wide impact.
When making sustainability claims, it’s essential to ensure they are truthful, verifiable, and backed by clear evidence. Misleading or unsubstantiated claims can damage trust with consumers, business partners, and regulators. With increasing scrutiny on environmental and social claims, companies should align with established guidelines and legal frameworks to avoid greenwashing—the practice of making misleading sustainability claims.
Key frameworks include:
- FTC Green Guides (U.S.): These guide how companies can avoid deceptive environmental marketing claims, emphasizing clarity, specificity, and substantiation.
- EU Green Claims Directive: This regulation aims to prevent misleading sustainability claims in the European market by requiring companies to back up claims with scientific evidence and ensure transparency.
To maintain credibility
- Ensure third-party certifications or robust data back claims.
- Be specific rather than vague—avoid broad or ambiguous terms like “eco-friendly” or “sustainable” without a clear context.
- Regularly review claims to stay aligned with evolving regulations and best practices.
- Be prepared to prove your claims with documentation if challenged by regulators or consumers.
Want to dive deeper? Check out:
FishChoice’s Sustainable Seafood Program Commitment Brainstorm Template and create a commitment using their template (available in Bahasa inggris, Español, dan 日本語).
FIPS & AIPS
Here are some resources to get started learning about FIPS:
- NS Pedoman untuk Mendukung Proyek Peningkatan Perikanan provide an overview of the structure and process for FIPs and were adopted as the basis for FisheryProgress.org. This document provides comprehensive guidance on supporting Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs). It outlines the definition, stages, and processes involved in FIPs, emphasizing the importance of addressing both environmental and social responsibility.
- FIPtraining.org adalah program pelatihan untuk membekali pemangku kepentingan perikanan di seluruh dunia dengan pengetahuan dan keterampilan yang diperlukan untuk mengembangkan dan menerapkan FIP.
- Kemitraan Perikanan Berkelanjutan mempertahankan a Perangkat FIP that provides general guidance on how to initiate and run FIPs, as well as templates and examples of documentation, and also provides a Alat Evaluasi FIP.
To incorporate social and financial responsibility into a FIP:
- NS Kerangka Evaluasi Perikanan Berdampak Tiga menyediakan struktur untuk merancang dan mengimplementasikan rencana perbaikan perikanan yang memperhitungkan hasil sosial, ekonomi, dan lingkungan.
To gain recognition for a FIP:
- FisheryProgress.org menyediakan akses ke informasi yang konsisten tentang kemajuan FIP, bukti terperinci untuk peningkatan, dan kemampuan untuk melaporkan terhadap yang baru Kebijakan Tanggung Jawab Sosial.
Here are some resources to get started learning about AIPS:
- NS Direktori AIP Kemitraan Perikanan Berkelanjutan provides an introduction to AIPs, along with an Perangkat AIP and directory, for those interested in starting or finding aquaculture improvement projects.
- NS Indikator Tata Kelola Akuakultur offer insight into how governments, industry, and civil society groups can work together to improve sustainable aquaculture practices.
Social Responsibility & Human Rights
Ensuring fair labor practices and protecting human rights are critical to sustainable seafood sourcing. Get started with these key actions:
Conduct a comprehensive review of labor conditions across your supply chain, addressing the full range of human rights and labor risks. Effective due diligence should encompass foundational areas such as grievance mechanisms, worker engagement, and responsible recruitment, as well as specific labor standards commonly included in codes of conduct: recruitment practices, nondiscrimination, harassment or abuse, forced labor, child labor, freedom of association, hours of work, fair compensation, and health & safety.
Assessing social responsibility and labor practices in seafood supply chains is a complex but critical step. Additional resources that can guide how to identify and evaluate risks:
- RISE “Assess” Step – Guidance on gathering and assessing information.
- RISE Social Responsibility Assessment – A practical tool for evaluating social responsibility performance.
- BSR: Human Rights Assessments – Identifying Risks, Informing Strategy – Broader resource on conducting human rights assessments.
These and other resources provide starting points, recognizing that assessing labor risk is a major undertaking requiring both structured tools and sector-specific knowledge.
Engage workers and local communities directly in discussions about their rights and welfare. Prioritize gender equity by promoting equal opportunities and addressing systemic inequalities across the seafood sector.
Respect for freedom of association and collective bargaining is central. Where representative worker organizations exist, engaging with them is the most effective and legitimate way to ensure that workers’ perspectives are heard. Supporting worker organizing and dialogue with unions or worker associations helps build trust, address grievances, and improve long-term labor practices.
For additional guidance:
- International Labour Organization (ILO) – Freedom of Association & Collective Bargaining
- ILO Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
Seafood and Gender Equality (SAGE) offers resources, dialogues, and tools to help seafood sector actors embed gender equality: lifting up women’s voices, supporting leadership, guiding gender‐aware policy development, and promoting equity in decision making.
- Amplifying Women’s Voices & Leadership: SAGE works to increase visibility for women’s roles in fisheries, aquaculture, and seafood companies, especially where they have been historically underrepresented in decision-making, management, or leadership roles.
- Providing Tools & Dialogue: Through its programs, such as Gender Equality Dialogues or WAVES, SAGE creates spaces for stakeholders to share challenges, best practices, and solutions related to gender equity.
- Resources & Policies: SAGE offers resources, reports, and guidance that companies and communities can utilize to develop gender-aware policies, conduct gender assessments, and integrate gender considerations into their strategies.
- Fostering Equity Culture: By embedding gender equality not just as an “add-on” but as a core part of resilience and sustainability, SAGE helps shift the culture toward recognizing and valuing women’s contributions at all levels.
Align your operations with globally recognized frameworks to ensure respect for human rights and labor rights throughout the seafood supply chain. Key references include:
- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
- OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
- International Labour Organization (ILO) instruments, including:
- The Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
- Conventions:
- No. 29 — Forced Labour Convention
- No. 87 — Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise
- No. 98 — Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining
- No. 135 — Workers’ Representatives
- No. 143 — Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provisions)
- No. 188 — Work in Fishing Convention
- Recommendations:
- No. 163 — Collective Bargaining Recommendation
- No. 94 — Consultation and Cooperation Recommendation
- No. 129 — Communications within the Undertaking Recommendation
NS Kerangka Monterey also provides a definition of sustainable seafood for company commitments that encompasses both environmental and social responsibility and could be used as an additional resource.
Address identified risks through actionable plans, including supplier engagement, training, and regular monitoring. This includes ceasing and remedying issues as well as learning & proactively mitigating those issues from arising in the future.
Publicly disclose your human rights due diligence efforts and progress through diverse channels—such as sustainability reports, third-party certifications, and other forms of public reporting—to build trust and accountability.
Note: While third-party certifications can contribute to transparency and form one component of due diligence, they should not be relied on as the sole approach, given their limitations.
NS Peta Jalan untuk Meningkatkan Etika Makanan Laut (RISE), a project of FishWise and the Consortium on Social Risk in Seafood, provides guidance for companies implementing human rights due diligence in the seafood industry. RISE focuses on Responsible Recruitment, Worker Engagement, and Grievance Mechanisms as essential building blocks of any social responsibility program. RISE includes:
- Alat Penilaian Tanggung Jawab Sosial: Evaluate supply chain operations to identify human and labor rights risks and issues.
- Guidance on Improvement: Identify gaps in your current practices and develop targeted strategies to address them, such as developing or planning to collect supply chain data, creating remediation plans, or improving traceability.
- Collaboration and Resources: Leverage the platform’s resources to engage with industry and other key stakeholders and promote best practices across the supply chain.
NS Alat Penilaian Tanggung Jawab Sosial untuk Sektor Makanan Laut helps evaluate the risks associated with social issues, identify areas for improvement, and inform the design of Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs) that integrate social objectives. Additional implementation toolkits and videos are available on the RISE website.
For FIPs specifically, refer to the PerikananProgress Kebijakan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial, which outlines requirements for incorporating social responsibility into improvement projects.
Climate strategy and human rights due diligence are not standalone initiatives; they intersect in ways that strengthen the overall sustainability journey:
- Low-Carbon Social Responsibility: Ensure that measures to reduce emissions do not inadvertently harm vulnerable communities, such as by displacing small-scale fishers or exacerbating inequities.
- Equity in Climate Adaptation: Support adaptation strategies that empower marginalized groups, such as providing access to resources, training, or technology to adapt to climate impacts.
Aliansi Pembandingan Dunia Indeks Pengelolaan Makanan Laut mengukur bagaimana 30 perusahaan makanan laut terkemuka di dunia menerapkan praktik tanggung jawab sosial dalam makanan laut.
More tools to explore include:
- NS Decent Work Initiative aims to identify the relationships between working conditions and forced labor among fishworkers. Recognizing enabling conditions and taking early action could protect fishers against more severe types of human rights abuses.
- The Certification and Ratings Collaboration’s Human Rights Abuses and Risks Tool compiles information from credible government and civil society organization sources to create a snapshot of human rights abuses and risks in the seafood sectors of 96 countries and territories, which represent 99% of global seafood.
- NS Alat Risiko Perbudakan Makanan Laut provides information on risks of forced labor, human trafficking, and hazardous child labor of seafood value chains using evidence and intelligence from credible sources, including peer-reviewed publications, investigative articles, and national and international indices and reports, among others.
Climate Change
A robust climate strategy is essential to addressing the environmental impacts of seafood production and ensuring long-term sustainability.
Here are some common steps to consider when getting started:
1. Calculate your Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Assess the carbon footprint of your supply chain, from fishing vessels or aquaculture facilities to processing and transportation. This assessment should include Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (energy-related), and Scope 3 (supply chain) emissions.
Additional resources include:
- Greenhouse Gas Protocol – Standards & Guidance
- IDH – Aquaculture Working Group on Environmental Footprint
- Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) – Ocean Hub
2. Set Science-Based Targets (SBTs)
Align your reduction goals with the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTI), which provides a clear pathway for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit global warming to 1.5°C.
3. Reduce Emissions
Implement measures to transition to low-carbon practices, such as adopting fuel-efficient technologies, sourcing renewable energy, and optimizing logistics to minimize transportation emissions.
4. Monitor and Report Progress
Use standardized reporting frameworks, such as the GHG Protocol, to track and share your progress toward emissions reduction targets transparently.
Invest in fisheries and aquaculture operations that incorporate climate adaptation strategies, such as diversifying species, enhancing habitat restoration, and employing innovative farming methods to mitigate climate-related risks.
Jelajahi Laut Bersama Kita situs web, which discusses why climate change poses a threat to ocean health.
Ketertelusuran
To get started learning more about traceability, explore these two resources:
Global Dialogue for Seafood Traceability (GDST)
The GDST is an international, business-to-business platform established to advance a unified framework for interoperable and verifiable seafood traceability. The GDST brings together more than eighty companies from around the globe and across different parts of the seafood supply chain. In March 2020, after a multi-year industry-led drafting process, the GDST released the first-ever standar global (GDST 1.0) mengatur konten informasi dan format data khusus untuk sistem ketertelusuran makanan laut.
Seafood Alliance for Legality and Traceability (SALT)
SALT is a global community that collaborates on electronic traceability solutions. SALT’s focus is on fisheries governments from countries that produce seafood. SALT encourages governments to adopt six Prinsip Ketertelusuran yang Komprehensif, yang dirancang bersama untuk membantu pengguna memperoleh manfaat tambahan untuk tujuan ekologi, sosial, dan ekonomi. Itu Jalan menuju Prinsip outlines the steps and resources needed to implement these principles.
Encourage government adoption of SALT’s Prinsip Ketertelusuran yang Komprehensif, yang dirancang untuk membantu pengguna mendapatkan hasil maksimal dari program ketertelusuran makanan laut mereka dengan mendukung tujuan ekologi, sosial, dan ekonomi. Mengunjungi Jalan menuju Prinsip untuk menemukan sumber daya untuk membantu menavigasi perjalanan keterlacakan Anda dan membuat proses pembuatan dan pengelolaan rencana untuk mengumpulkan data yang berguna dari aktivitas penangkapan ikan menjadi lebih mudah bagi perusahaan dan pemerintah.
Partnerships
One of the unique and defining features of the seafood sustainability movement is the high level of pre-competitive collaboration across the sector. Unlike in many industries, companies and NGOs have recognized that the complex, global challenges facing the seafood industry—ranging from overfishing to human rights abuses—cannot be solved in isolation. Instead, they have invested in platforms and partnerships that promote shared learning, aligned commitments, and joint action.
Pre-competitive collaboration helps:
- Avoid duplication by sharing resources, tools, and best practices.
- Drive alignment on expectations and standards for suppliers and producers.
- Increase efficiency by pooling funding and expertise toward common goals.
- Amplify impact by sending unified market signals and policy messages.
These efforts are often organized around two main types of initiatives:
1. Business-led platforms:
Groups of companies that come together to tackle shared challenges in sourcing, labor, and sustainability. Examples include:
- Pakta Laut – a group of North American seafood companies investing collectively in improvement projects and innovation.
- Satgas Seafood (STF) – an industry-led initiative addressing environmental and social responsibility in Southeast Asian supply chains, with a strong focus on traceability and labor rights.
- FishWise Retailer Roundtable (FWRT) – U.S. retailers sharing lessons and coordinating expectations for suppliers.
- Aliansi Tuna Global (GTA) – a network of retailers and supply chain companies driving improvements in tuna fisheries through coordinated advocacy.
2. Multi-stakeholder initiatives:
Collaborations that bring businesses, NGOs, and sometimes governments together under shared frameworks. Examples include:
- Aliansi Konservasi untuk Solusi Makanan Laut (CASS) – providing global guidance, resources, and alignment for companies and NGOs.
- Forum Tuna LSM – NGOs working together to align asks and strategies in the tuna sector.
- Aliansi Makanan Laut Global (GSA) – convening diverse stakeholders through certification, events, and dialogue.
- Inisiatif Makanan Laut Berkelanjutan Global (GSSI) – pre-competitive public-private partnership producing guidelines and uniting hundreds of global organizations.
Together, these platforms embody the seafood sector’s commitment to collective action. They demonstrate that while companies may compete on product and brand, they can—and must—collaborate on building sustainable, socially responsible supply chains. This culture of pre-competitive collaboration has been essential to advancing progress more quickly and consistently across the industry, and it continues to serve as a model for other sectors grappling with global sustainability and human rights challenges.
Partnerships between NGOs and seafood businesses are one of the driving forces behind progress in responsible seafood. NGOs bring expertise in environmental and social issues, global best practices, and connections to civil society, while businesses bring market influence, supply chain knowledge, and the ability to drive change on the water.
Typically, these partnerships begin with setting sustainability commitments — clear, time-bound goals that outline how a company will source seafood more responsibly. NGOs often help businesses design these commitments to align with international standards and industry best practices.
Implementation is where collaboration deepens: NGOs may support businesses with tools and guidance to improve supply chain traceability, adopt certifications or ratings, develop fishery or aquaculture improvement projects (FIPs/AIPs), or address labor and human rights challenges. Businesses, in turn, work with their suppliers to put these commitments into practice, track progress, and report transparently.
At their best, these partnerships are long-term, collaborative, and adaptive — combining business incentives with NGO expertise to create meaningful improvements for oceans, ecosystems, and communities.
Some of the key NGOs globally that have long-standing partnerships with seafood businesses include:
- Ikan Bijaksana – Works with retailers, suppliers, and brands to develop sourcing policies, implement traceability systems, and address social responsibility.
- Kemitraan Perikanan Berkelanjutan (SFP) – Collaborates with companies through Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs), Aquaculture Improvement Projects (AIPs), and Supply Chain Roundtables.
- WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) – Partners with major global retailers, suppliers, and food service companies to set and achieve sustainable seafood commitments, often using MSC/ASC certification pathways.
- Bijaksana Laut – Provides science-based recommendations and partnerships to help businesses improve sourcing and consumer engagement.
- Jam Tangan Makanan Laut (Monterey Bay Aquarium) – Maintains a widely used ratings system; also partners with businesses to shift sourcing away from “red” products.
- Perdagangan Adil AS – Works with seafood companies to implement Fair Trade–certified supply chains, with a strong focus on social responsibility and community benefits.
- Konservasi Internasional (CI) – Partners with businesses and governments to advance responsible sourcing and support fisheries and aquaculture improvements.
- Dana Pertahanan Lingkungan (EDF) – Focuses on policy and fishery reform, often working alongside businesses that want to support sustainable fisheries.
- Dewan Penatalayanan Kelautan (MSC) dan Dewan Penatalayanan Akuakultur (ASC) – While not NGOs in the same advocacy sense, they’re nonprofit standards bodies that collaborate directly with companies to achieve certification goals.
In October 2025, CASS will host a “Day Zero” opening workshop during its annual conference, titled “The Future of NGO/Industry Partnerships in Sustainable Seafood: Resetting expectations, evolving collaboration, and finding opportunities to adapt to a shifting landscape.”
The conversation arose from a realization that we have reached a pivotal moment in the movement that warrants a reevaluation of these partnerships. As the landscape continues to shift, we will attempt to confront a critical question: What does meaningful collective action look like now across the seafood sector, and how should responsibilities be divided among parties?
We will share high-level insights from that conversation in early 2026.
Glossary
Aquaculture: The farming of aquatic species, such as fish and shellfish, in salt, brackish, or freshwater. About half of the seafood produced globally is from aquaculture operations. Examples of aquaculture include:
- On/Off Bottom Cultures
- Ponds and Tanks
- Recirculating Aquaculture Systems (RAS)
- Net Pens
Aquaculture Improvement Projects (AIPs): Similar to FIPs but focused on improving the sustainability of aquaculture operations.
Bycatch: Fish and other marine life that are incidentally caught while fishing for the target species. Bycatch is generally discarded dead while at sea and can include seabirds, turtles, marine mammals, juveniles of the target species, or targeted fish from other fisheries. Reduction of bycatch is an ongoing effort in many fisheries and is a common criterion in wild seafood sustainability ratings and criteria in assessing the overall sustainability evaluation.
Certifications: Programs that directly engage with fisheries or farms, requiring them to meet standards for environmental and social responsibility.
Chain of Custody: A requirement of certification programs that ensures certified seafood is kept separate from non-certified products and can be tracked at every step, from harvest to final sale. This guarantees the integrity of certified products throughout the supply chain.
Ecolabel: A market-based tool to promote the sustainable use of natural resources, acting as a seal of approval given to products that are deemed to have fewer impacts on the environment than other products. It comes in the form of a tag or label placed on a product certifying that the product was produced in an environmentally friendly way, designed to allow those producers to sell at a certain price and be rewarded by market forces.
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): The 200-nautical-mile zone from a country’s coastal border that gives that country exclusive fishing rights as established by the international Law of the Sea.
Fishery Improvement Projects (FIPs): Multi-stakeholder efforts to improve the sustainability of fisheries, addressing both environmental and social issues.
High Seas: The designation given to an area of the ocean, outside any country’s EEZ, that is not governed by any single country and where much of the global fishing activity takes place.
Human Rights Due Diligence: The process of identifying and addressing human rights risks within the seafood supply chain.
Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing: Fishing activities that violate national or international laws, threaten sustainability, and often involve human rights abuses.
Key Data Elements (KDEs): Essential pieces of information that must be collected, verified, and transmitted throughout the seafood supply chain to ensure product traceability, legality, and responsible sourcing. As defined by the Global Dialogue on Seafood Traceability (GDST), KDEs include data such as species name, harvest location, production method, and date of capture or landing—each critical to verifying the integrity and sustainability of seafood products from source to final sale.
Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY): The maximum amount of a species that can be removed from its environment without diminishing the long-term health of the overall population; a term that is often used by scientists and fishery managers when making recommendations or establishing fishing limits. It is a theoretical limit representing the largest long-term average catch that can be taken from a stock under prevailing environmental and fishery conditions.
Overfished: The population size of a stock is too small, so the remaining fish population cannot reproduce to the same or greater level. The term overfishing refers to the action, whereas the term overfished refers to the status of a stock. A stock may be overfished, but overfishing may not be occurring, especially if the fishery is closed.
Overfishing: The amount of fish taken in a fishery is greater than the amount of the remaining fish population can reproduce to the same or greater level; a net loss in fish. The term overfishing refers to the action, whereas the term overfished refers to the status of a stock. A stock may be experiencing overfishing and may not be overfished, but is at risk of becoming overfished.
Ratings: Assessments of seafood sources in key markets, providing information on their performance for fisheries and aquaculture.
Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): An international body made up of countries that share a practical and/or financial interest in managing and conserving fish stocks in a particular region. RFMOs are established by international agreements or treaties and can take different forms. There are currently 17 RFMOs covering various geographic areas, some of which overlap.
Science-Based Targets (SBTs): Greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming.
Seafood Fraud: Seafood fraud ranges from seafood substitution, short-weighting, and mislabeling seafood. These can be committed along the supply chain and vary from simple misunderstandings or lack of information to blatant deception to increase profits and attempts to launder illegally harvested seafood.
Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF): Fisheries that operate at a smaller scale, often providing vital livelihoods in coastal communities.
Social Responsibility: The principle that businesses in the seafood industry should integrate ethical, environmental, and social considerations into their operations, balancing profit-making with positive societal impact. This includes adhering to international labor laws, upholding human rights, ensuring fair and safe working conditions, and supporting the livelihoods and well-being of coastal communities.
Socially Responsible Seafood: Socially Responsible Seafood includes the following key components:
- Protecting human rights, dignity, and respecting access to resources.
- Ensuring equality and equitable opportunities
- Improving food and livelihood components: For more information on social responsibility in seafood supply chains, please visit the Roadmap for Improving Seafood Ethics (RISE).
Stock: A distinct subpopulation of a larger group of species that is reproductively isolated to some extent from other populations; in fishery management, the term can be used to describe one or more subpopulations of one or more species. The term stock can sometimes refer to a biological stock or a management stock. A biological stock (population) can mean a group of individuals of the same species that inhabit the same geographic region and mix and interbreed when mature. A management stock is often a biological stock, but may also include a multi-species complex or geopolitical boundaries.
Stock Assessment: The measurement of a stock status relative to defined limits. Their purpose is to project harvest levels that optimize yield, prevent overfishing, and rebuild depleted stocks. They take into account the stock abundance, biology, and catch levels.
Supply Chain Roundtables: Collaborative initiatives focused on improving the sustainability of specific seafood supply chains.
Supply Chain Transparency: Efforts to trace seafood through the supply chain to prevent fraud and IUU fishing.
Sustainable Seafood: Seafood from sources that maintain or improve upon the long-term viability of harvested species and the environment, as well as the livelihoods of fisheries-dependent communities and businesses. It can refer to seafood coming from both well-managed wild fisheries and responsible aquaculture sources.
Sustainable Seafood Certifications: Certification programs are requested by a fishery, farm, or private entity and offer a chain of custody and traceability standards on sustainability claims. Fishery assessments are conducted by independent, accredited certification bodies. Wild-capture certification programs offer transparency and stakeholder engagement during the assessment process. Sustainability claims can only be made by the certified fishery, farm, or client and can include on-product marks like ecolabels.
Sustainable Seafood Ratings: A program used to rate seafood products by a third-party assessment organization based on a product’s importance to the market. Assessments and ratings are science-based and do not involve participation by or input from the fishery or farm. It does not result in an ecolabel, but generally allows for generic sustainability claims.
Total Allowable Catch (TAC): A fishery management term that defines the total amount of a target species that can be taken within a given time period, usually based on a fishing season or annual basis.
Traceability: The ability to track seafood products through the supply chain from origin to final sale.
Transparency: Refers to publicly disclosing information to customers, consumers, and regulatory bodies.
We want to hear from you! Get updates and let us know how we can improve this resource.

